On The Den
06 November 2013
The interview explores topics following the release of the documentary What The FUQ? - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government".
The origin of money in today's system is explored - created as a debt that can never be repaid. Contrast this to state created money, without borrowing from private banksters, where the people retain ownership of the infrastructure it is spent on.
Referenced within is the following quote:
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson in the debate over the Re-charter of the Bank Bill (1809)
You may have to listen to this a few times... we end up speaking pretty quickly covering topics at a rapid rate.
Also discussed is the creation of Two You's - more can be read on this subject in this article.
Consider what is involved to be the "Administrator" of the unlawfully created "You" - is involvement with this entity the sanction of the impostors that created it? Regardless of any supposed benevolent intent in the creation of that entity, it is still a product of a criminal action. One would probably be concerned about letting a known paedophile babysit your son or daughter.
Where do your rights come from? Are they granted or natural? Are you coerced into acting as an employee of a corporation masquerading as government? What rights do you have in that role?
Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others - Thomas Jefferson
Consider also pretend laws:
Common expressions, such as: ‘The courts have declared a statute invalid,’ sometimes lead to misunderstanding. A pretended law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to disregard it. Naturally he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour – but such a decision is not an element which produces invalidity in any law. The law is not valid until a court pronounces against it – and thereafter invalid. If it is beyond power it is invalid ab initio.” - [emphasis added] South Australia v Commonwealth (“First Uniform Tax case”) (1942) 65 CLR 373 at 408, Latham Chief Justice
Regardless of whether that Chief Justice was lawfully commissioned, and as discussed in the interview; a pretend law is a pretend law!!
Download the Denial of Rights document here. Consider returning UNOPENED correspondence received from a Bankster or "Government" asking if the right to question the identity of the Addressee is denied.
If one can't question what's on the outside of an envelope... what are the chances of questioning the contents?