Tag Archives | Corporate Government

Paying Tax… What For?

Brown Bag TaxMention the idea that taxes are unlawful, unconstitutional, unjust etc at a dinner party, and most people will look at you like you are a freak. “Who is going to pay for the roads?” – “Who will pay for defence?” – “Who will pay for public services?”

Most will complain for hours about how they dislike paying taxes… but it is accepted nonetheless as necessary.

When you state the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) belongs to the Australian Government and not the Government of the Commonwealth (the one in the original constitution)… who cares?

You can say the ‘Acts’ that the ATO rely upon came from the Parliament of Australia and not the Parliament of the Commonwealth (again… the one in the original constitution)… so what?

It’s as if deep inside a program is running that despite logic and reason says “Pay Tax, Pay Tax, Pay Tax” – who would instil such thinking,er … brainwashing?

When most of the population pay tax, you are taught tax in school, encouraged to find a good accountant to minimise tax when working, there’s little room for thinking outside the brown paper bag… we are groomed from an early age to be Taxpayers.
Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

Case Study – Australian Taxation Office – Criminal Or Constitutional?

Australian Taxation Office ATO logoThe Australian Taxation Office is feared by many Australians. One hint of a phone call from the ATO and people start shaking in their boots..? Why is this so?

Typically the ATO are asking you questions… “Why haven’t you paid” or “We’ll engage (private) debt collectors if you don’t pay…”

What if there were some questions you could ask the tax office to satisfy yourself they are not impostors?

Could you be in trouble for liaising with a company pretending to be government?

Let’s start with the ATO Letterhead comprising the Coat of Arms – the Kangaroo and Emu beside the “Australian Government.”

This stylised version here is black and white and is a registered trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Search serial number 89000532 or simply “Australia.” Note that even though the Coat of Arms was granted to the Commonwealth of Australia in 1908 and revised in 1912, it is still not the seal used by the monarch. See examples in 1913 and 1925 and their significance here.

The burning question again… Are there two governments: Is the Australian Government one and the same as the Government of the Commonwealth? – you know, the one that’s in the original constitution.

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

If a ‘Person’ is a Legal Entity, What’s Your Real Identity?

Absent Limits Identity image

Originally Posted on Wake Up World on 28 Feb 2014
By Ken Bartle
Guest Writer for Wake Up World

Suppose that the word ʻpersonʼ (by definition) has been misconstrued in meaning. Suppose that in our society, a ‘person’ is a LEGAL ENTITY, a thing, an artificial construct and not a ʻliving beingʼ? Suppose that you are blissfully ignorant of this deception, and truly believe that you are a “person”.

What if your government considers a ‘person’ to be a corporate entity? And what if, without your knowledge or consent, you are legally responsible for a corporate entity that bears your name? And as a consequence you are bound by rules and laws that were meant to govern commerce, not people?

What ill consequences might arise from your ignorance? And who might benefit from this misunderstanding? Letʼs look.

So what is a person? Is a “person” a ʻthingʼ, is it a legal entity, or is it a ʻliving beingʼ? That needs to be clear.

This article pursues the concept of the ʻpersonʼ and exposes our system of ‘identification’ as a most damnable and contemptuous crime.

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

The Den – Interview With Scott & Ken Bartle

Interview with Scott Bartle & Ken BartleThe Den HFQ Podcast
On The Den
06 November 2013

The interview explores topics following the release of the documentary What The FUQ? – Frequently Unanswered Questions of the “Australian Government”.

The origin of money in today’s system is explored – created as a debt that can never be repaid. Contrast this to state created money, without borrowing from private banksters,  where the people retain ownership of the infrastructure it is spent on.

Referenced within is the following quote:

 “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson in the debate over the Re-charter of the Bank Bill (1809)

You may have to listen to this a few times… we end up speaking pretty quickly covering topics at a rapid rate.

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

Scott Bartle On The Dirty Little Secret About Your Government

Truth News Australia T Shirt

Interview by Hereward Fenton
Truth News Australia
11 Sep 2013

This interview followed the release of the documentary What The FUQ? – “Frequently Unanswered Questions of the Australian Government”.

Discussed is the potential of how today’s Australian Government is acting as an administrator for a bankrupt country… where Taxpayers are required to pay loans to private banksters – unnecessary loans – had the original government printed money through the treasury as once was done in historical times.

It is little wonder why the ‘National Debt’ appears to grow and grow… America continues to raise their ‘debt ceiling’ whilst volunteers mow lawns at memorials.

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

Apparent Failure To Vote..?

Screw Us And We MultiplySo you received an “Apparent Failure to Vote” Notice..?

First off… how apparent was it..? Either you did vote or you didn’t. So which was it..?

What if you wrote back and asked some questions..?

  • On a scale of 1-10, how apparent was it I didn’t vote..? with 1 being “definitely not”, and 10 being “we don’t really know”?
  • Was it a rumour started in the office that I didn’t vote..?
  • Did my mother/girlfriend/ etc… tell on me..?
  • You get the idea… get creative…

So why the softly softly approach..? Does the purported “AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION” having Australian Business Number 21 133 285 851 and Dun & Bradstreet DUNS number: 750020034 need your consent to send you an invoice… er… fine..?

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

CruizeFM Interview With Scott Bartle

Scott Bartle 1959 Corvette FrontCruizeFM interview with Scott Bartle
by Aldo
29 Jul 2013

Is there really a corporation called The Commonweath of Australia?

In this interview with Scott Bartle, producer of What The FUQ?, Scott highlights his battle with “Customs”, when he Questioned some of the laws that made it difficult for him to get his 1959 Chevrolet Corvette into Western Australia..

Scott says ”Laws are slowly eroding our freedoms, while the Will of the People is being ignored.” Do you

  • find it scary?
  • find this controversial?
  • find this a load of rubbish?
  • agree / disagree?
  • think he is a crackpot?
  • think he is a champion of the people?
  • think he is meddling in things We the People should not get involved in ?

Is there really a system in place that wants to erode our freedoms?? If you know better… I Want To Know!!!!!

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

The Commonwealth of Australia Corporation

US securities and exchange commission SEC

The idea that the Commonwealth of Australia is a corporation registered in Washington DC is foreign to most people. Others are in pure disbelief. Others reason that it is necessary for trading.

One thin is for certain. An official response, with evidence, is yet to be seen to some very serious questions:

Is the “Australian Government” one and the same as the “Government of the Commonwealth“?

Is the “Parliament of Australia” one and the same as the “Parliament of the Commonwealth“?

Who owns the Commonwealth of Australia Corporation registered in Washington DC? – If it is owned here in Australia, surely the company in Washington would report back to Australia? Why is it the reporting appears to be from Australia to Washington?

Why is it that there are so many elements of today’s Commonwealth of Australia that parallel corporate behaviour:

  • Their websites are copyright protected
  • They have ‘Client Service Charters
  • Logos are trademarked
  • They have Australian Business Numbers
  • They have Dun & Bradstreet DUNS numbers
  • They are registered in a company database
  • They have a prospectus – seemingly for investors?
  • They have a business address
  • Some have multiple trading names
  • They produce annual reports

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

Your Claims Are Baseless!

Angry GirlSend a notice to a “Government Department” asking for validation they are legitimate under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and likely you will get a response that states … “Your claims are baseless!” – or they may just ignore you.

Assuming they reply… have you actually made a claim – or did you just seek information? Putting that aside momentarily, why would they state “Your claims are baseless”?

Could it be the “Australian Government” isn’t actually bound by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), meaning their masters are not the people comprising the Commonwealth?

Perhaps they’ll send you the form they want you to fill out again… as if you didn’t get it the first time. Maybe they’ll write that your matter has been considered and denied… if you disagree with our decision you can take the matter to court. Fat lot of good that would do in an environment where all are unwilling/unable to validate their authority!

Alternatively your reply may instead use words such as .. “your letter has no basis in law”, or … “your letter has no validity”. Look who’s making claims now!

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading

The Vinny Eastwood Show – Bancorruptcy

The Vinny Eastwood ShowThe Vinny Eastwood Show – BANCORRUPTCY
11 Jun 2013
Interview Archive

This interview followed the creation of the 5min video Bancorruptcy. It discussed the documentation available that describes the creation of money and when it takes place… that is, when a ‘borrower’ gives their promise to pay.

Some of the pertinent statements in banking publications include:

“Banks create money when they lend it” (Money Banking & Monetary Policy… Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, May 2007)

“… banks extend credit by creating money.” (Quarterly Bulletin, Q1 Vol 48. No. 1. Bank of England, 2008)

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading